Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Female Doctor Genital

Peter Pan was a homosexual?

nine o'clock in the morning, now narrow to write a post, but I apply myself because I have to download a criticism that is affecting my heart good relativist.

While drinking your coffee eating a cookie after another, I read an article of La Repubblica reported Friday that the interview with a British ethologist, Desmond Morris, about his new book "The Naked Man." At first sight it seems to be a very brilliant writing that combines knowledge of psychology and biology, were it not for his definition of that category of sexual orientation, called a thousand pseudonyms, but more generally HOMOSEXUAL. According to this brilliant scientist gays were human beings who have never completed its growth cycle, staying a little longer infants in order to have more attention to the creative and sensitive belonging to each of us. This is to explain why many artists are gay. This explanation is unfounded in my opinion (from what is explained that a gay is creative), general (not all gays are creative) and deterministic (a gay man can have such preferences from birth or following data can be certain events, then does not mean that is neither creative nor more sensitive than other heterosexual). There may be a thousand and one reasons to be independent of the homosexual gene. I mention two: occasional social desirability. How come we have high rates of imprisonment in homosexuality? Why in southern Italy there is less gay than in the North Italy?
I leave you to reflect. Science sometimes insists on wanting to ask "almost explanations" exposing themselves in areas where not only can not be certain of his conclusions, but even a strong hold. The human psyche has a huge degree of variability that can be caused also by the individual context, so any generalization suffers from unfounded.
I'm not saying to stop the search or not to make assumptions, but do not shoot to zero society.

9.30 am. Good day ...

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Maybelline Everfresh Foundation Ivory

unnecessary or gratuitous violence? I'm back

generally do not stretch on my blog to news reports, but the bombing ( setting the agenda as political scientists prefer to call ) , the media has influenced me. We want to reflect on a recent news items: murder or accident Sandri. As the incident is serious in itself being a young twenty-eight dead, I want to emphasize the opacity of the media and politicians, consequently, that seem to focus discussion on how to limit violence in stadiums, offering more rigid rules about , emphasizing the controls, etc. ... I'm talking about
opacity because the fact trigger a dynamic stresses in mind: the murder took place on the forecourt of a motorway , not within a sports facility, then it would probably be more useful as a premise that we examine the reasons that lead to various supporters also manhandled at a neutral venue. In the early stages can easily act reasons astraibili as direct contact with other fans in a tone that is defamatory offend the losing team or vice versa, past discord, and exciting atmosphere of war, however, all variables that are raised by the fact sports in progress. Sandri But if we are faced with a real battle took place on a neutral field, usually out of the logic-competitive sports. I ask you, because they are far from the relentless logic of typhus, it can really generate such hate to the point where there is no reason to be reflected? Apparently it is, so to prevent it in my opinion would be more useful research on the motivations behind this hate. Whether it's football as a social phenomenon that affects the values \u200b\u200bof citizens Italian and English there is no doubt, but let us ask ourselves if these acts do not happen in other sports events more obscured, less publicized by the media. What is the purpose of a fan? Blow off steam? Make your opponent in a position to "win"? Keep up the name of the team or the fans that is following more informal writing from violence? How much influence have the psycho-social factors on the violence of the fans? Assuming that the feeling of violence is certainly determined by the group in which the individual belongs to, he enters into it already aware of what that entails?
I'm not saying that stricter laws are not helpful, trying to persuade the most fan to take offense, but do not solve because if not extinguished the sentiment behind the fan will altrenative strategies to accomplish them, and also is not that Italy is in first place for the sense of law and rejection of impunity. So the potential offender will feel entitled to make the violent act in the name of something in excess of authority a little authority.
honestly do not know how to address the fans already mature and well together, speaking by birth, but I think educating children to a greater understanding of as himself and a natural sense of legality beyond charges can be of great help to prevent rather than cure .

Sometimes accidents do not happen just by chance.
Lorenzo